This HTML5 document contains 44 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

frame:Be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasFrameElement

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

Subject Item

n10:quarreling

rdfs:subPropertyOf

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fschema:subsumedUnder

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasSuperFE

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

Subject Item

n7:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

owl:propertyDisjointWith

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:excludes

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasFERelation

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:isExcludedBy

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

Subject Item

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

rdf:type

fn15schema:FrameElement owl:ObjectProperty

rdfs:subPropertyOf

n6:similarity

owl:sameAs

n12:question

rdfs:domain

frame:Similarity frame:Be_in_agreement_on_assessment

rdfs:range

owl:Thing

rdfs:comment

This FE denotes an implicit question in response to which the Cognizers give their Opinions, which are then assessed for their similarity. The Question may concern the identitiy of a particular entity, as in the first example below, or it may be of the yes/no-type, as in the second example below. I think we see eye to eye in our ultimate goal, which is that we want to see a democratic Serbia. Almost all anarchists, in contrast, would agree in their condemnation of warfare, ie, violent conflict between governments.

rdfs:label

Question

fschema:subsumedUnder

n6:similarity

owl:propertyDisjointWith

n4:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:FE_coreType

Core Core

fn15schema:FE_name

Question Question

fn15schema:definition

<def-root>This FE denotes an implicit question in response to which the <fen>Cognizers</fen> give their <fen>Opinion</fen>s, which are then assessed for their similarity. The <fen>Question</fen> may concern the identitiy of a particular entity, as in the first example below, or it may be of the yes/no-type, as in the second example below. <ex>I think we <t>see</t> <t>eye</t> <t>to</t> <t>eye</t> <fex name="que">in our ultimate goal</fex>, which is that we want to see a democratic Serbia.</ex> <ex><fex name="Cognizers">Almost all anarchists</fex>, in contrast, would <t>agree</t> <fex name="que">in their condemnation of warfare, ie, violent conflict between governments</fex>.</ex> </def-root> This FE denotes an implicit question in response to which the Cognizers give their Opinions, which are then assessed for their similarity. The Question may concern the identitiy of a particular entity, as in the first example below, or it may be of the yes/no-type, as in the second example below. I think we see eye to eye in our ultimate goal, which is that we want to see a democratic Serbia. Almost all anarchists, in contrast, would agree in their condemnation of warfare, ie, violent conflict between governments.

fn15schema:excludes

n7:be_in_agreement_on_assessment n4:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasSuperFE

n6:similarity

fn15schema:FE_ID

8180

fn15schema:FE_abbrev

que

fn15schema:FE_cBy

JKR

fn15schema:FE_cDate

2005-06-16T14:14:09+02:00

fn15schema:frameElementOf

frame:Be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasFERelation

n4:be_in_agreement_on_assessment n7:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:isExcludedBy

n7:be_in_agreement_on_assessment n4:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

Subject Item

n2:point_of_dispute

rdfs:subPropertyOf

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fschema:subsumedUnder

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasSuperFE

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

Subject Item

n4:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

owl:propertyDisjointWith

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:excludes

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:hasFERelation

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment

fn15schema:isExcludedBy

n2:be_in_agreement_on_assessment