This HTML5 document contains 34 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n7http://premon.fbk.eu/resource/
fn15schemahttps://w3id.org/framester/framenet/tbox/
n9https://w3id.org/framester/framenet/abox/fe/Profiled_alternative.
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
framehttps://w3id.org/framester/framenet/abox/frame/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
sthttps://w3id.org/framester/framenet/abox/semType/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n8https://w3id.org/framester/framenet/abox/fe/Contrasting_alternative.
Subject Item
frame:Alternatives
fn15schema:perspectiveOn
frame:Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Alternativity
Subject Item
frame:Presentation_of_mitigation
fn15schema:perspectiveOn
frame:Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Alternativity
Subject Item
st:Non-Lexical_Frame
fn15schema:isSemTypeOf
frame:Alternativity
Subject Item
frame:Causation_scenario
fn15schema:uses
frame:Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Alternativity
Subject Item
frame:Negation
fn15schema:inheritsFrom
frame:Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Alternativity
Subject Item
frame:Alternativity
rdf:type
owl:Class fn15schema:Frame
owl:sameAs
n7:fn17-alternativity
rdfs:comment
In this frame, there is a Profiled_alternative that the speaker wishes to primarily focus on and which is mutually exclusive with a Contrasting_alternative. It is not possible for both to be true in the same context with the same participants, although the described situation may be true of the same entities at different times, or true of different entities at the same time. Frames inheriting from this one, e.g. Negation, may indicate which of the alternatives is imagined to be the case, but in other frames related to this one, e.g. Conditional_scenario and Alternatives, both alternatives are presented as possible, and which one is true remains an open question.
fn15schema:isPerspectivizedIn
frame:Presentation_of_mitigation frame:Alternatives
fn15schema:isUsedBy
frame:Causation_scenario
rdfs:label
Alternativity
fn15schema:definition
In this frame, there is a Profiled_alternative that the speaker wishes to primarily focus on and which is mutually exclusive with a Contrasting_alternative. It is not possible for both to be true in the same context with the same participants, although the described situation may be true of the same entities at different times, or true of different entities at the same time. Frames inheriting from this one, e.g. Negation, may indicate which of the alternatives is imagined to be the case, but in other frames related to this one, e.g. Conditional_scenario and Alternatives, both alternatives are presented as possible, and which one is true remains an open question.
fn15schema:frame_name
Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameElement
n8:alternativity n9:alternativity
fn15schema:hasSemType
st:Non-Lexical_Frame
fn15schema:isInheritedBy
frame:Negation frame:Conditional_scenario
fn15schema:frame_ID
2950
fn15schema:frame_cBy
MJE
fn15schema:frame_cDate
2015-06-30T16:46:11+02:00
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Causation_scenario frame:Presentation_of_mitigation frame:Conditional_scenario frame:Alternatives frame:Negation
Subject Item
frame:Conditional_scenario
fn15schema:inheritsFrom
frame:Alternativity
fn15schema:hasFrameRelation
frame:Alternativity