. . "A Phenomenon is portrayed with respect to the Degree of likelihood that it will be perceived and known, given the (usually implicit) Evidence, Perceiver, and the Circumstances in which it is considered. For several of the LUs, such as visible, audible, etc., the type of the Evidence is fixed by the targets themselves being a perceptual experience. It's abundantly obvious that we'll need to spend more time on public perception. Are you certain that the shovel was visible from the door of the apartment? I think they miss some of the important impacts of the work that are not visible just from looking at the vote tally. That the defense will declare a mistrial regardless is quite evident from their consistent obstructionist tactics. In late July 2000 it was barely visible to the unaided eye."@en . . . . . . . . "A Phenomenon is portrayed with respect to the Degree of likelihood that it will be perceived and known, given the (usually implicit) Evidence, Perceiver, and the Circumstances in which it is considered. For several of the LUs, such as visible, audible, etc., the type of the Evidence is fixed by the targets themselves being a perceptual experience.\nIt's abundantly obvious that we'll need to spend more time on public perception.\nAre you certain that the shovel was visible from the door of the apartment?\n I think they miss some of the important impacts of the work that are not visible just from looking at the vote tally.\nThat the defense will declare a mistrial regardless is quite evident from their consistent obstructionist tactics.\nIn late July 2000 it was barely visible to the unaided eye."^^ . . . . "2005-03-25T14:44:53+01:00"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "i+s"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Obviousness" . . . . . . "1360"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . "A Phenomenon is portrayed with respect to the Degree of likelihood that it will be perceived and known, given the (usually implicit) Evidence, Perceiver, and the Circumstances in which it is considered. For several of the LUs, such as visible, audible, etc., the type of the Evidence is fixed by the targets themselves being a perceptual experience.\nIt's abundantly obvious that we'll need to spend more time on public perception.\nAre you certain that the shovel was visible from the door of the apartment?\n I think they miss some of the important impacts of the work that are not visible just from looking at the vote tally.\nThat the defense will declare a mistrial regardless is quite evident from their consistent obstructionist tactics.\nIn late July 2000 it was barely visible to the unaided eye."^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Obviousness"^^ . "Obviousness" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "JKR" . . . . . . . . . . . . "A Phenomenon is portrayed with respect to the Degree of likelihood that it will be perceived and known, given the (usually implicit) Evidence, Perceiver, and the Circumstances in which it is considered. For several of the LUs, such as visible, audible, etc., the type of the Evidence is fixed by the targets themselves being a perceptual experience. It's abundantly obvious that we'll need to spend more time on public perception. Are you certain that the shovel was visible from the door of the apartment? I think they miss some of the important impacts of the work that are not visible just from looking at the vote tally. That the defense will declare a mistrial regardless is quite evident from their consistent obstructionist tactics. In late July 2000 it was barely visible to the unaided eye."@en . . . . . . . . . . . .